Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn
I don't like Fire Emblem games. I can see that now. About halfway through Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn, I decided that continuing to play the 2007 Wii tactical RPG would be about as fun for me as...reading All the Pretty Horses again. By why isn't this storied series my cup of tea?
Game Over? But I just started! |
When each of your respective characters gets their turn, a movement grid appears around them, upon which you can direct the character to any spot. The grid moves with you as you progress across the playing field, at times growing smaller according to more difficult terrain, like slopes. If you move close enough to an enemy, you can choose to attack them, whereupon a screen showing an animation of that attack appears. You also have the choice to end the turn using an item, like a healing herb, instead of attacking. Complete the chapter goals, like defeating a boss, or staying alive for a certain amount of turns, and you complete the chapter. There are 37 chapters.
I told you the stupid bird was cute. |
I had a good time to start. Radiant Dawn felt like an onscreen board game and turn-based-RPG rolled into one. The game allows you to utilize many different types of characters: swordsmen or ax men who have to land right next to an enemy square in order to attack, archers who can attack from two squares or more away, lancers who can do both, and many more. There are even mage characters who can heal the rest of your party. Sure, you don't really get to know these characters, and they start to become more and more interchangeable as the game goes on, but early in, when the fields of play and mission objectives are simple, strategizing how to best use them is a thrill. For the first 10-15 hours, I was truly enjoying the game. Then cracks began to appear in the facade.
Look, it's Ike from Smash Bros.! Uh...I think I'm gonna go play Smash Bros. now. |
Radiant Dawn introduces character after character, location after location, and it's all just narrative white noise. Seven or eight missions in, I started skipping the cutscenes, which had become a time-wasting drag. You can access each mission's objective at any point during the chapter anyway
That's fine, I thought. I'm only playing this for the gameplay, anyway.
Then, it happened.
I reached the final chapter of the second part of this five-part game. Each part focuses on a different set of characters in a different location of the game's kingdom, which ensures you not only won't get too attached to any of them, but will be even more confused by the convoluted plot. When the characters die in a mission, they're dead permanently, anyway. Okay, so back to the end of the second part of of the game...
As I hinted at before, every one of Radiant Dawn's chapters has a condition that must be met to progress. They also have conditions of failure, such as allowing a particular character to die,or giving up on certain square on the playing field. The second part's final mission features many, many enemies and allies, and has a winning condition of surviving for 15 turns. A turn finishes when every character for you, your enemies, and your allies have had the opportunity to act. The game was already starting to get stale, when I, with a horror, realized I would be wasting time just sitting there, watching enemies and allies moving around for a vast amount of time. I eventually pulled out my stopwatch, and found that during each turn in the chapter, the enemies and allies took at least 3.5 minutes to complete all their moves...and I didn't have the option to skip watching their moves take place.. 15x3.5 is...more than 50 minutes. That's more than 50 minutes of just one of Radiant Dawn's 37 missions that I had to spend just sitting there watching what was going on on the screen. And this is a mission that occurs before the halfway point. I nearly went out of mind.
Why does your game hate me, Ike?! |
And so I did.
I should mention, though, the music up to that point was solid Nintendo stuff, but not good enough to make me want to finish the game. There's some voice-acting, but it's rarely utilized, mainly just in certain cutscenes. The graphics are solid, particularly in some of said cutscenes. Really, everything about the production values is solid. The gameplay, though...as much fun as the more straightforward missions can be, just becomes too tedious...
To me. As I said, Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn just isn't my type of game. Perhaps I'm being too hard on it. Then again, the overly convoluted narrative is a legitimate complaint. The way the game introduces too many characters to allow the player to emotional connect with any one of them is a legitimate complaint. The way the player has to sit through long patches of video game AI making its moves is a legitimate complaint. Cormac McCarthy taking 100 pages just for the kid to ride his damn horse home at the end is a legitimate complaint! Yes, Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn isn't my type of game--but I'd have the same complaints about these issues if they existed in a game in any genre that I enjoy. Imagine having to watch K. Rool putz around for an hour before you, as Donkey Kong, are allowed to defeat him? That's not very enjoyable...and life's too short to spend 60 hours playing a game you don't enjoy.
My better tomorrow will be spent playing a different game! |
Okay, I have to talk about the English teachers thing. I had a couple in college that were conspicuous. The Children's Lit and YA class I took? I earned a B on every presentation I did (we had to do like 4-5) on a book we read. We were supposedly just graded to hit on certain aspects of the book, since not everyone in the class read every one of these books. Unlike some mind-numbingly boring people who pretty much read things off like a report card, my groups always did them as fun skits, referencing jokes from SNL, etc., WHILE HITTING ON ALL OF THOSE FACTS. The boring people got As--people who got As while in other groups who teamed up with me suddenly earned Bs. For my final presentation, my groupmates agreed we should just do the boring approach, as apparently the prof liked being bored. We earned a B. There is no doubt in my mind that prof disliked me, and I have no clue why. If I was the type of person to dispute a grade, I would have. I kind of wish I was, looking back.
ReplyDeleteI've also written papers following a thesis set up for a prof (once in college, the other you know about, in my MFA), and then they downgraded me for that thesis they agreed to earlier. What. the. heck.
Okay, so now to the game. I actually like a lot of these Fire Emblem games, but I've been in to this kind of thing since playing the original Final Fantasy Tactics. Sometimes the story is a little anime melodramatic, but I remembered liking the stories for these--though I did play Ike's first game on the Gamecube (this was a sequel to that one), so maybe I appreciated it a bit more. Though looking at one review, it sounds like the Gamecube one had a much better storyline. I do remember that one better, so it probably did.
I don't recall the long waits for enemies to go. I know the most recent on the Switch has ways to let you speed this up (and you certainly need to know what they do for you to take your turn well), but maybe they improved on something I'm not recalling. But certainly, if you don't really care much about the storyline, it's harder to care about the outcome of the battle, I would say.
The Switch one is interesting, as your young main character becomes a professor at an academy training students for their futures as knights, etc. Things are peaceful in the surrounding lands, but you can guess that they're not going to continue in that way. I think my biggest criticism of the game (like Gamespot review), is that you don't know everything about the main character's story through one playthrough--you can go one of three major directions in the game, which changes things a lot. If you like the game, that's not necessarily a problem, but even then... I haven't finished a second playthrough, even though things are fairly different supporting a different house in the school.
So even though there are definitely some anime tropes in this one as well, the problem for me is how they kept too much hidden. I get wanting your choices to matter, but at some point, I just want to know it all (like flipping through a choose your own adventure book to see them all).
--Neal
I had one other class like this, Philosophy of Film, where I'd write killer papers and always get an 80. Not a 79, not an 81. Always a token 80 on anything. I tanked the final, and got one of my only two college "C's" because I lost the will to try, and couldn't work up the energy to study. Maybe someone named "Neal" killed your teacher's father. You've gotta make sure you never do that to any of your students (give them low grades due to bias, not kill their fathers).
ReplyDeleteAs for Fire Emblem, I have some experience with this genre, but all my complaints here just kind of added up to create the ultimate irritation. Then again, I know this genre isn't my favorite, which is why I still gave it what I hope is an objective score. I think this might be my only foray into the Fire Emblem world (outside of Smash Bros. games). I am starting to realize constant action in a game, with just a few well-placed lulls, is more my taste.